deep dive into the Lit-Hop Lessons - volume 2 tracks

Lesson 1: I Am Undeniable (Pluto's Revenge)

Subject: On being defined out of belonging by people with the power to redraw the lines

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union held a vote. Pluto — discovered in 1930, taught in classrooms for seventy-six years as the ninth planet, beloved in the way that small and distant things often are — was reclassified. Dwarf planet. No longer a member of the club. The solar system, it turned out, had a dress code, and Pluto didn't meet it anymore.

Pluto didn't change. The criteria did.

I Am Undeniable (Pluto) gives Pluto a voice, and Pluto has things to say. The track speaks in first person — not in anger exactly, but in something more complicated and more honest than anger. I am multitudes of science and myth / but also isolated and friendless / I deserve better. That last line lands quietly and stays. Not a demand. Not a tantrum. Just a clear-eyed statement from something that has been named, studied, celebrated, and then voted out of the category it had always occupied.

What makes this resonate beyond astronomy is how precisely it maps onto a feeling most people have had at some point — the experience of being redefined by external criteria you had no hand in setting. The job that restructures you out. The community that shifts its standards after you've already built your life around meeting them. The category you thought you belonged to, until someone with the authority to draw lines decided otherwise. Pluto's situation is cosmic and specific and also somehow completely ordinary.

The title insists on itself: I Am Undeniable. Not "I was a planet" or "I used to belong." The present tense is doing real work here. Whatever the IAU decided, Pluto is still out there, still orbiting, still composed of multitudes. The reclassification changed what humans call it. It didn't change what it is.

That's the lesson.

Themes: exclusion, belonging, identity, the arbitrary nature of categories, persistence in the face of being redefined

If this track made you think about: a time you were voted out of something you'd always been part of, or anyone who kept going after the world changed the rules on them — Pluto sees you.

Lesson 2: Black Hole Language

Subject: On the creative search for the exact right words, told through the physics of space

Space is a vacuum. No sound in that room.

Black Hole Language opens with a paradox and builds an entire creative philosophy inside it. Sound cannot travel through space — there are no molecules to vibrate, no medium to carry it — and yet the song uses the physics of the cosmos as the most precise language available to describe what it feels like to make music. The contradiction is the point. The search for the right words is its own kind of void: vast, silent, and full of things you can't quite reach.

The track follows the creative process from the inside — not the polished version where inspiration strikes cleanly, but the real one. Searching and seeking the words that are right / what does it sound like — when does it strike. That uncertainty, that pursuit, is the engine of the whole song. Too many words exist. The right phrase is out there somewhere, orbiting just out of reach, and the work is navigation — finding your north star, tracking the fly-bys, catching the moments before they pass.

What makes the metaphor earn its keep is how scientifically specific it gets. Comets built from sound bytes. Dark matter and dust forming concentration. ET gravity as a mixing principle. This isn't vague "reach for the stars" language — it's a working cosmology applied to craft. When MC Evol writes stars, gas, dark matter and dust / form a concentration and I trust / when I bring together elements of sound / I am using the same common ground, that's not decoration. That's a statement about how creative assembly actually works: disparate elements pulled together by something invisible until they collapse into something new.

And then the chorus hits like a gravitational event: nothing can escape. The black hole isn't a threat here — it's the aspiration. To make something with that kind of pull. To reshape the universe of whoever's listening. To record something on tape that holds people in its orbit long after the song ends.

Black Hole Language is my art. Said plainly, without apology, in the middle of the most expansive metaphor on the album. That's the lesson.

Themes: the creative process, language and craft, music-making as cosmology, the search for precision, the physics of inspiration

If this track made you think about: the frustration of reaching for something you can't quite name, the moment a chord or a line finally locks into place, or the ambition to make something nobody can look away from — you're already inside the black hole.

Lesson 3: Point Pleasant Legend

Subject: What happens to communities that ignore the warnings they're given

In November 1967, the Silver Bridge connecting Point Pleasant, West Virginia to Ohio collapsed during rush hour. Forty-six people died. For months before the collapse, residents had reported sightings of something strange — a large, winged, red-eyed figure that came to be known as the Mothman. The sightings stopped the day the bridge fell.

Make of that what you will. The song does.

Point Pleasant Legend takes the Mothman seriously — not as a monster, but as a messenger. In this telling, the creature isn't something to fear. It's something that showed up, repeatedly, to tell a community something was wrong. And the community, as communities often do with things they don't understand, looked away.

The line that lands hardest is simple and devastating: the thing about truth, it can whack you in the head. It doesn't arrive gently. It doesn't wait for you to be ready. And ignoring the problem results in ghosts — which is both literally true in the Point Pleasant story and true in every other context you'd want to apply it to. The people lost on that bridge. The warnings that went unheeded. The weight a town carries when it wonders, afterward, whether things could have been different.

This is a track about what we do with inconvenient information. The Mothman didn't fit into any category that made sense, so people dismissed it, explained it away, turned it into a punchline. And then the bridge fell. Point Pleasant Legend doesn't blame the town — it grieves with it. That's the radical empathy at work here. It's not a finger-pointing song. It's a song about how hard it is to hear something true when the truth arrives in a form you weren't expecting.

The Mothman has since become a beloved figure in Point Pleasant — there's a statue, a museum, an annual festival. The town found a way to hold the strangeness and the grief together. That's worth something too.

Themes: folklore and myth, truth-telling, community resilience, grief, the cost of dismissing what we don't understand

If this track made you think about: a warning you ignored, a truth that arrived sideways, or a community that had to rebuild after something unthinkable — you're in the lesson.

Lesson 4: Capricious

Subject: The rapper who is never wrong, the narrator you can't quite trust, and why that sounds a lot like something else right now

Every genre has its unreliable narrator. Hip-hop has a specific one: the rapper so locked into their own legend that reality has stopped being relevant. They're the hardest. The realest. The most slept-on, the most underrated, the most inevitable. Ask them — they'll tell you. They'll tell you at length.

Capricious puts you inside that head.

The narrator here isn't lying, exactly. That's what makes it interesting. They're not performing confidence for the crowd — they genuinely believe what they're saying. They've pattern-matched their way to a version of themselves that holds together perfectly from the inside, and they have no mechanism for questioning it. They fill in the gaps with certainty. They mistake fluency for accuracy. They're very, very sure of themselves, and that sureness is the problem.

The title is a clue. Capricious means governed by whim, unpredictable, operating without consistent logic — which is not how the narrator sees themselves at all. They think they're precise. They think they're right. The word the song is named after is a verdict they'd never accept.

Here's where it gets timely: if you've spent any time paying attention to AI over the last couple of years, this portrait will feel familiar from a completely different direction. The term for what AI systems do when they generate confident, wrong information is hallucination — filling gaps with plausible-sounding invention, with no flag on the uncertainty. MC Evol wrote a song about a delusional rapper. They also, accidentally or not, wrote a pretty precise description of how large language models fail.

That double reading isn't a stretch — it's the song doing its job. Good writing finds the pattern underneath the specific subject. The specific subject here is someone in a booth who thinks they're untouchable. The pattern underneath is what happens when any system — human or otherwise — loses the ability to distinguish what it knows from what it's invented.

Themes: unreliable narration, self-delusion, confidence vs. accuracy, hip-hop bravado as character study, and yes — AI hallucination as an unexpected parallel

If this track made you think about: that one person you know who is always certain, how we construct narratives about ourselves that protect us from uncomfortable truths, or why AI keeps making things up with such conviction — all of that is fair game. That's the lesson.

Lesson 5: Pass, Bounce, Oop

Subject: Women athletes perform at the highest level. The pay doesn't match.

This track comes with receipts.

Pass, Bounce, Oop is about the gender pay gap in professional sports, and it doesn't deal in vague gestures toward fairness. It goes specific — the NBA versus the WNBA, the numbers, the history, the players. It names what's happening and doesn't flinch from it.

Title IX was passed in 1972. It prohibited sex-based discrimination in any educational program receiving federal funding, and it transformed women's participation in sports at every level. More than fifty years later, the gap between what women athletes are paid and what their male counterparts earn remains staggering — not because women's sports lack talent, competition, or viewers, but because the structures built around them have never been designed to close that distance.

Caitlin Clark became one of the most talked-about players in college basketball history before entering the WNBA — breaking records, selling out arenas, driving television ratings in ways the league had never seen. Her rookie WNBA salary was a fraction of what a comparably dominant NBA player would earn. The argument that women's sports "just don't generate the same revenue" conveniently ignores who controls the infrastructure, the broadcasting deals, the marketing budgets, and the arenas that determine whether that revenue ever gets built in the first place.

The chorus of Pass, Bounce, Oop is built like a chant — which is exactly right. This is a crowd song, a game song, a song for anyone who has watched a woman athlete perform at an elite level and felt the quiet fury of knowing the check she takes home doesn't reflect it.

Radical empathy, in this track, is the decision to actually pay attention — to look at the numbers, say them out loud, and not accept the usual explanations for why they are the way they are.

Themes: gender pay equity, women's sports, Title IX, the WNBA, structural inequality, the gap between talent and compensation

If this track made you think about: a woman athlete you admire, a pay gap you've encountered in your own life, or the distance between what someone is worth and what they're paid — the lesson is in all of it.

Lesson 6: Eternal IT Crowd

Subject: What if the afterlife is just another help desk?

Somewhere, right now, someone is submitting a ticket. It will be triaged, logged, assigned, escalated, closed without resolution, and reopened. There will be a follow-up. There will be a follow-up to the follow-up. The system will persist long after anyone remembers why it was built.

Eternal IT Crowd imagines that this is also what happens after you die — at least if you spent your career in tech support. The premise is absurdist and immediately, uncomfortably funny: IT workers, deceased, find themselves in the afterlife running the same helpdesk they ran in life. The tickets keep coming. The problems never change. The system is eternal in the most exhausting sense of the word.

The word gobsmacked appears in the track, and it earns its place — it's the exact right register for the specific flavor of disbelief this scenario requires. Not horror. Not rage. Just the wide-eyed, jaw-dropped bewilderment of someone who has just realized the joke is on them and the punchline never ends.

But underneath the dark comedy is something with real teeth. The track is about labor — specifically about the workers who keep systems running and are rewarded for it with more system. It's about tech-bro control structures that outlive the people inside them. It's about the particular cruelty of a job that defines you so completely that even death doesn't offer an exit. The afterlife in this song isn't fire and brimstone. It's a queue that never empties.

Eternal IT Crowd is a reference to The IT Crowd, the beloved British comedy about a small, overlooked tech support team operating in the basement of a large corporation — invisible, undervalued, and indispensable. The reference is affectionate and sharp at the same time. The show found humor in the gap between how much IT workers knew and how little they were respected for it. The song extends that joke into infinity and asks: what does it mean when the system you serve becomes the only thing that survives you?

Themes: labor, tech culture, absurdism, the afterlife, bureaucracy, the systems that outlive us

If this track made you think about: a job that felt endless, a system you couldn't escape, or anyone who kept the lights on and never got credit for it — the helpdesk is open. Your ticket has been received.

Lesson 7: Bookmark

Subject: On grief, survival, and the books that hold us together when everything else falls apart

A bookmark is a small act of return. You put it down because you plan to come back.

Bookmark is a song about the periods in life when that return feels uncertain — when loss has stripped away the familiar structures and you're not sure what you're orienting toward anymore. It's about reaching for books in those moments not because they have answers, but because they hold still when nothing else does.

There's a reason reading shows up in grief. A book doesn't need you to be okay. It doesn't ask how you're doing. It just stays open at the page you left it, waiting, patient in a way that people — even the kindest ones — sometimes can't be. Bookmark understands that, and it doesn't try to pretty it up.

The track sits differently from everything else on this album. Where other lessons here take on myths, systems, planets, and institutions, this one goes small and quiet. One person. One loss. The small rituals of survival. It earns its place on the syllabus precisely because it's the reminder that radical empathy starts close — with yourself, with your own grief, with giving yourself permission to just hold the page and not turn it yet.

Themes: grief, memory, reading as survival, the rituals that keep us going, loss and the slow work of return

If this track made you think about: a book you turned to during a hard time, or someone you lost, or the strange comfort of a story that has nothing to do with your life but somehow holds it anyway — that's exactly where this lesson lives.

Lesson 8: Judy Visits Frances

Subject: The cost of becoming a legend before you're grown

Her name wasn't Judy. It was Frances — Frances Ethel Gumm — and she was a child when the industry decided that name wouldn't do.

Judy Visits Frances is written from inside Judy Garland's perspective, and that framing matters immediately. This isn't a biography or a tribute. It's an act of imaginative empathy — sitting with Judy as she looks back at Frances, the girl she was before the machine got hold of her, and reckoning with the distance between them.

That distance is the subject of the song. Judy Garland became one of the most iconic performers of the twentieth century at enormous personal cost — her body managed and suppressed from girlhood, her habits shaped by what the studio system needed from her, her private self increasingly difficult to locate beneath the public one. The song doesn't sensationalize any of this. It sits with it. There's a line that lands like a closed door: can't go home because I'm already here. Home is Frances. Here is Judy. And Judy has been Judy for so long that the way back isn't clear anymore.

What makes this track land as a lesson rather than just a portrait is the universality underneath the specificity. Most of us haven't had our names changed by a studio, but most of us know something about performing a version of ourselves so consistently that it starts to feel like the only version. The public self and the private self. Who you became and who you were before. Judy Visits Frances uses one of the most famous lives of the last century to ask a question that belongs to everyone.

The title itself does quiet work — Judy visits Frances. Present tense, ongoing. Not a reunion. A visit. As if the two of them are still separate, still finding their way to each other across all those years.

A note for listeners: Frances Gumm was Judy Garland's birth name. Knowing that isn't required to feel the song, but it deepens everything.

Themes: identity, fame and its costs, childhood and what gets lost, the gap between public and private self, grief for who you were

If this track made you think about: someone who gave everything to become something, the version of yourself that existed before the world had expectations of you, or anyone whose public success was built on private devastation — the lesson is in all of that.

Lesson 9: Return to Chaos

Subject: The Earth, narrating its own destruction

The Earth doesn't ask for much in this song. It just tells you what it sees.

Return to Chaos is narrated by the planet itself — not as a metaphor, not as a literary device at arm's length, but as a direct address. The Earth is speaking. It has been watching. It has been patient in the way that ancient things are patient, which is to say: not infinitely. I can only observe so much greed.

That line is the center of the track. Not rage, not catastrophe — observation. The Earth isn't raging here so much as it is bearing witness, which is somehow more unsettling. Rage you can argue with. A witness just tells you what happened.

Desire is fire — Earth is dirt. Five words that hold the whole problem. Human wanting is combustible, consuming, directional. The Earth is the thing underneath it all, the thing being consumed. The equation is simple and the math is grim.

What elevates the track beyond a straightforward environmental statement is the way it closes — a cascading list of synonyms, words stacking on top of each other like geological layers: yearn, wish, pine / ground, terrain, soil. It's a poetic device that earns its place. By the time the song ends, the Earth has given you every word it has for what it wants and every word it has for what it is, and you're left sitting with the distance between them.

This is radical empathy extended as far as it goes — not to another person, not to a community, but to the planet itself. The album asks you to feel with the marginalized, the overlooked, the redefined. Return to Chaos asks you to feel with the ground under your feet.

Themes: environmentalism, greed, the Earth as narrator, witnessing, the cost of human desire

If this track made you think about: what we're leaving behind, or what the world would say to us if it could — it already did. You just listened to it.